Drawing for MARK TWAIN CASINO

USPTO serial 76309178

MARK TWAIN CASINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARK TWAIN CASINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katten Muchin Zavis

BECKY A WILLIAMS KATTEN MUCHN ZAVIS ROSENMAN525 W MONROE STSTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60661-3693

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041casino servicesACTIVEJul 25, 2001
042restaurant and bar servicesACTIVEJul 25, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 25, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 16, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance