USPTO serial 76309459
ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Crowe
DANIEL A CROWE METROPOLITANBRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3300ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2733Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Women's apparel, namely, bathrobes, belts, berets, Bermuda shorts, blazers, body suits, camisoles, capes, caps, cardigans, chemises, coats made of cloth and leather, overcoats, rain coats, sport coats, suit coats, dresses, dressing gowns, gloves, golf shirts, gowns, evening gowns, night gowns, halter tops, hats, headwear, jerseys, jumpers, jump suits, knit shirts, lingerie, loungewear, neckwear, pajamas, pantsuits, pantyhose, play suits, polo shirts, pullovers, rainwear, rompers, scarves, shawls, shifts, shirts, undershirts, skirts, slacks, sleepwear, socks, sport shirts, suits, sweaters, both turtle and v-neck sweaters, swimwear, t-shirts, tank tops, tennis wear, tops and vests | ACTIVE | May 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |