USPTO serial 76309582
MAXIMUSCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2971198Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIMUSCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Watford, Hertfordshire, WD18 8JZ, GB
Watford, Hertfordshire, WD18 8JZ, GB
Watford, Hertfordshire, WD18 8JZ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Nash
William B. Nash Jackson Walker, LLP112 E. Pecan StreetSuite 2400San Antonio, TX 78205-1525Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated nutritional dietary and food supplements and vitamins in the form of powders, tablets and capsules, all for body building and sports nutrition; medicated energy and protein preparations in the nature of dietary supplements and nutritional supplements in the form of energy and nutritional drinks; nutritional meal replacement bars for the sports market; dietary supplements and nutritional supplements in the form of weight gain bar for the sports market; nutritional and energy drinks in the nature of vitamin and nutritionally fortified water for sports people and athletes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Protein based, nutrient dense snack bars for the sports market; energy and sports drinks, namely, milk-based drinks for sports people and athletes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Energy bars in the nature of candy bars, cereal bars, cereal food bars, granola snack bars, chocolate based and covered food bars for the sports market; energy and sports drinks, namely protein shakes for sports people and athletes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Energy and sports drinks, namely herbal drinks in the nature of herbal food beverages and herbal tea for food purposes, mineral waters and soft drinks for sports people and athletes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maximuscle Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Maximuscle Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Maximuscle Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MAXIMUSCLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |