USPTO serial 76309634
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-60546 Frankfurt, DE
D-60546 Frankfurt, DE
D-60546 Frankfurt, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Anne Matheson
JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation; business planning and management in the field of transportation; logistics management in the field of transportation and delivery; import agencies; inventory control; administrative data processing services; providing business information relating to the field of transportation and delivery; business management services, namely, managing supply flow logistics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Delivery of goods by air, road, rail and sea; freight transportation by truck, train and air; packaging articles for transportation; warehouse storage; warehousing services; guarded transportation of valuables by truck; cargo handling; consultation services in the field of transportation; providing information relating to the transportation and delivery of goods; providing information in the field of transportation at the specific request of end-users by means of telephone or global computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software consultation, development and maintenance; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; data conversion of computer program data or information; installation of computer software; integration of computer systems and networks; computer network design for others; computer programming for others; computer project management services; computer services, namely designing and implementing network web pages for others; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network, all relating to the field of delivery, transport and logistics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |