Drawing for PEAKSHAVING

USPTO serial 76309728

PEAKSHAVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEAKSHAVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT G SCHULER

ROBERT G SCHULER KEGLER, BROWN, HILL & RITTER LPA65 E STATE ST STE 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215-4294UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Energy management services, namely tracking, reporting, analyzing and delivering energy information via a global information networkACTIVE—
042Engery related services, namely, automatic meter-reading, meter data management and analysis; energy usage managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance