Drawing for SNAKE RIVER CANYON RANCH

USPTO serial 76309751

SNAKE RIVER CANYON RANCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2701551Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2003
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAKE RIVER CANYON RANCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN I WILDMAN

KAREN I WILDMAN LEWIS & ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4429UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING AND LAYING OUT OF RESIDENTIAL AND/OR COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIESSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDDec 12, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 6, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 9, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 6, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 23, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance