USPTO serial 76309751
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN I WILDMAN
KAREN I WILDMAN LEWIS & ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1900PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4429UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING AND LAYING OUT OF RESIDENTIAL AND/OR COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 12, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2005 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |