Drawing for O'KEEFFE'S WORKING HANDS CREME

USPTO serial 76309798

O'KEEFFE'S WORKING HANDS CREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with O'KEEFFE'S WORKING HANDS CREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W. COOK

THOMAS W COOK3030 BRIDGEWAY STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965-2810UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005NON-CLEANSING, MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS FOR NON-INDUSTRIAL USE, NAMELY, MEDICATED CREAM PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF SKIN SPLITS AND CRACKS, AND ABRASIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 28, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 29, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance