Drawing for DIRIGO

USPTO serial 76310105

DIRIGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRIGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Meyer

JAMES R. MEYER SCHNADER HARRIS SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1600 MARKET STREETSUITE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for androgen replacement theapy or pain managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2008NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
May 16, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
May 15, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
May 15, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 14, 2008REINREINSTATED—
Jul 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance