USPTO serial 76310203
TITANTRONIC ANTIROUILLE ELECTRONIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITANTRONIC ANTIROUILLE ELECTRONIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint Paul de Montminy, Quebec, CA
Saint Paul de Montminy, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic rust-free corrosive free system for cars, trucks and heavy equipment composed of a microprocessor and titanium anodes used to analyse of the rate of corrosion and rust on iron parts and regulate electrical impulse used to arrest rust and corrosion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |