USPTO serial 76310290
NAVCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAVCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL F. CLAYTON
MICHAEL F CLAYTON MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PRODUCTS, NAMELY,GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS AND DIFFERENTIAL RECEIVERS,WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM RECEIVERS, RADIOS, ANTENNAE, AND GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR USE IN GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | TRACKING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, TRACKING,LOCATING AND MONITORING STATIONARY OR MOBILE OBJECTS ON LAND OR SEA OR IN THE AIR | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MESSAGING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, VOICE, MULTIMEDIA, AND TEXT MESSAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SATELLITE POSITIONING SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING PRECISION POSITIONING, VEHICLE NAVIGATION, MARINE AND OFFSHORE NAVIGATION SERVICES AND PRECISE POSITIONING DATA TO USERS; TECHNICAL AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CONSULTING IN THE AREAS OF GEODETIC PRODUCTS,SURVEYING, AND SATELLITE POSITIONING SYSTEMS, NAMELY,TECHNICAL CONSULTATION REGARDING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEMS, WIDE AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEMS, AND MULTI-FUNCTIONAL TRANSPORT SATELLITE AUGMENTATION SYSTEMS;TECHNICAL AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CONSULTING IN THE AREAS OF EUROPEAN GEOSTATIONARY NAVIGATION OVERLAY SERVICES, GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS,SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS, WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES,SPREAD SPECTRUM RADIOS, RADIO FREQUENCY AND DIGITAL PRODUCT DESIGN, APPLICATION SPECIFIC INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVELOPMENT, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, REAL TIME EMBEDDED SOFTWARE, VEHICLE NAVIGATION, AND VEHICLE AND ASSET TRACKING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NavCom Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NAVCOM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |