USPTO serial 76310360
IMAGE-WATCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGE-WATCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Meyer
JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRIS1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS ANALYZING THE CONTENT OF WEBSITES AND MONITORING VISUAL ASSETS INFRINGEMENT; VISUAL SEARCH SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS SEARCHING AND RETRIEVING SIMILAR IMAGES BY ANALYZING THEIR DIGITAL SIGNATURES; AND VISUAL SEARCH SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS CONDUCTING SIMILARITY SEARCHES BETWEEN PRODUCT CATEGORIES AND DATABASES TO LOCATE SIMILAR PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |