Drawing for STARLINGS

USPTO serial 76310395

STARLINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STARLINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM W. JONES, ESQ.,

PAUL HERBERT RICHES MCKENZIE & HERBERT2 BLOOR ST E STE 2900TORONTO, ON M4W 3J5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys, games and playthings, namely, mechanical action toys, electrical action toys, toy arrows, toy bows, toy arrow and bow sets, baby multiple activity toys, bath toys, bathtub toys, battery operated action toys, bendable toys, cat toys, children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels, children's multiple activity toys, children's wire construction and art activity toys, construction toys, crib toys, disk toss toys, dog toys, drawing toys, electric action toys, fantasy character toys, flying toy saucers, infant toys, inflatable ride on toys, inflatable toys, musical toys, non-riding transportation toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, plastic character toys, play mats containing infant toys, plush toys, pop-up toys, printing toys, pull toys, punching toys, push toys, ride-on toys, rubber character toys, sandbox toys, sketching toys, soft sculpture toys, squeeze toys, stuffed toys, talking toys, water squirting toys, windup toys, dolls and accessories therefor, doll place setsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance