USPTO serial 76310408
WINPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Plastic material in sheet, block and roll form, namely high-density polyurethane foam sold as a raw material for industrial and manufacturing use | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear; shoe soles, shoe insoles, shoe outsoles, shoe pads not orthopedic in nature, sports shoes, athletic shoes, boots; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, inner soles; men's, women's and children's jackets, shirts, trousers, suits, scarves, clothing belts, hats, gloves, socks, ties and neckties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KUN HUANG ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by KUN HUANG ENTERPRISE CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WINPAD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |