USPTO serial 76310409
ROMAN D.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, GERARD ANTOINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROMAN D.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-79674 Todtnau-Aftersteg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK624 9TH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Bathroom articles entirely or predominantly of plastic material and/or metal, namely stools, nail brush hanging consoles, storage consoles, mirrors of glass without frame and with frame of plastic material or metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | brush goods with bristle heads of wood or plastic material and with natural bristles or plastic bristles, bathroom articles entirely or predominantly of plastic material and/or metal, namely bath tub holds, towel racks, towel rings, hooks, toothbrush glasses with or without holder, soap dishes, soap containers, soap holders, trays for hair toiletry sets, paper towel dispensers, cotton wool dispensers, cotton wool containers, toilet paper holders, toilet brushes, toilet brush sets including toilet brushes and toilet brush holders, bath brushes, nail brushes, toothbrush glasses of glass | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |