Drawing for EMDIT

USPTO serial 76310487

EMDIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMDIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William David Kiesel

WILLIAM DAVID KIESEL KIESEL, KEEGAN & DENICOLAPO BOX 15928BATON ROUGE, LA 70895-5928UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DATABASE MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRYABANDONEDMar 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 1, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 1, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 1, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 2008OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 11, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 7, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance