USPTO serial 76310516
FM4910
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FM4910?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD OBRIEN ET AL2000 MARKET ST FL 10PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flame retardant fluoropolymer plastic material for the semiconductor industry sold in sheets, rods, and other preformed shapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |