Drawing for BIOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 76310536

BIOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2670585Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 31, 2002
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BIOSCIENCE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brooke Erdos Singer

Brooke Erdos Singer DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Provision of online information on a wide variety of topics via a global computer networkSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2023CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 31, 2021REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Nov 21, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Nov 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 26, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 20088.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 7, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 5, 2008ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 12, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 10, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2005CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 16, 2004PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 22, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 22, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance