Drawing for HÄSTENS EXCELSIOR

USPTO serial 76310556

HÄSTENS EXCELSIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HÄSTENS EXCELSIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020beds, bedsteads of wood, (Based on Intent to Use) mirrors including bathroom mirrors, picture frames, mattresses, spring-mattresses, pillows, and down pillowsACTIVE—
024textile products not included in other classes, namely bed covers and curtains of textile; bed linen, namely, sheets, pillow cases, down quilts and bed clothesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 22, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 22, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 5, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2005ABNDABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB—
Oct 7, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance