USPTO serial 76310556
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
S-731 23 ENKOPING, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | beds, bedsteads of wood, (Based on Intent to Use) mirrors including bathroom mirrors, picture frames, mattresses, spring-mattresses, pillows, and down pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | textile products not included in other classes, namely bed covers and curtains of textile; bed linen, namely, sheets, pillow cases, down quilts and bed clothes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |