USPTO serial 76310558
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone apparatus and fittings thereof namely, fixed, mobile and cellular telephones, adapters in the form of smart card readers for telephones and mobile telephones, coded cards; scanners; electronic interfaces; digital cash registers; card reader slot devices,· all products comprising parts of a system for payment transactions for registering bank and giro means of payment as well as monetary transfers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, books in the field of telecommunications, magazines in the field of telecommunications, office equipment, namely, paper shredders, staplers, hole punchers, printed instructional, educational and teaching material in the field of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Preparing and placing advertisements for others, business management planning, clerical services, computerized on-line retail services in the field of chemical products, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products, communication apparatus, computers and clothing; electronic retailing services via computers featuring chemical products, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products, communication apparatus, computers and clothing, distributorship of chemical products, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products, communication apparatus, computers and clothing, sample distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming and web site design for other companies, computer programming and design for other companies of data bases related to communication networks and the Internet; legal advisory services, computer consultation services, technical advice in the nature of troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, programming of computer software for other companies, designing of computer software for other companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELEFONICA MOVILES, S.A
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIVO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |