Drawing for CROCK KOOL

USPTO serial 76310572

CROCK KOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROCK KOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit juice drinks and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, soft drinks, including carbonated soft drinks, and flavored drinking watersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 24, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 2, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 15, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance