USPTO serial 76310595
OILMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OILMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie A. McWhirter
JULIE A MCWHIRTER HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE LLP750 BERING DRHOUSTON, TX 77057-2149UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | APPARATUS, NAMELY A HYDRAULIC PUMPING SYSTEM, FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF OIL AND GAS WELLS, AND FOR USE IN TRANSFERRING FLUID FROM DOWNHOLE TO THE SURFACE BY A HYDRAULICALLY POWERED JET PUMP | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF EQUIPMENT, NAMELY A HYDRAULIC PUMPING SYSTEM, FOR THE TRANSFERRING OF FLUID FROM DOWNHOLE TO THE SURFACE BY A HYDRAULICALLY POWERED JET PUMP FOR GAS AND OIL WELLS; RENTAL OF GAS AND OIL WELL EQUIPMENT FOR THE EXTRACTION OF GAS AND OIL FROM SUBTERRANEAN WELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |