USPTO serial 76310883
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christel Emerson
CHRISTEL EMERSON HENKEL CORPORATION2200 RENAISSANCE BLVD THE TRIAD, STEGULPH MILLS, PA 19406UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated hair care preparations and products, namely hair mousse, hair shampoo and conditioners; non-medicated skin care preparations and products, namely, facial cleaners, facial creams, facial emulsions, facial masks, facial scrub, facial lotion; non-medicated foot cleansing preparations, namely, foot powder, foot cream, foot lotion; body cleansing preparations, body powder, body cream, body lotion, body soaps, and non-medicated body soaks; nail care preparations, namely, nail cream, nail enamels, nail glitter, nail tips, nail glue, nail lacquer, nail hardeners, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, nail strengtheners, and nail buffing preparations; perfume; perfume oils; cosmetics; essential oils for personal use; body soaps; non-medicated bath salts; dentifrices; and toiletries, namely, deodorants for personal use, antiperspirants, shaving cream, shaving lotion, shaving gel, bubble bath, cuticle creams and cuticle conditioners, facial masks, toothpaste, tooth gel, non-medicated mouthwash | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |