USPTO serial 76310924
ERJ 145 XR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ERJ 145 XR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
San Jose dos Campos, SP 12225-901, BR
Other trademarks owned by EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE DOW LOHNES ALBERTSON1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036-6805UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | aircraft engines and their parts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |