Drawing for MDVIPNET

USPTO serial 76310931

MDVIPNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MDVIPNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Judith L. Grubner

JUDITH L GRUBNER MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPSTE 2000TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ 180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, SCHEDULING APPOINTMENTS FOR OTHERS; DATA ENTRYACTIVE—
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE FOR RETRIEVAL OF PATIENT INFORMATIONACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance