Drawing for SBM ST. SEBASTIAAN BELGIAN MICROBREWERY

USPTO serial 76311002

SBM ST. SEBASTIAAN BELGIAN MICROBREWERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALVES, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SBM ST. SEBASTIAAN BELGIAN MICROBREWERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas S. Hogan, Jr.

THOMAS S HOGAN JR THE HOGAN LAW FIRM20 S BROAD STBROOKSVILLE, FL 34601-2829UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Brewery equipment; knowledge and hardware relating to brewery; alcoholic beveragesACTIVEAug 10, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 6, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance