Drawing for EMPLOYABILITY

USPTO serial 76311058

EMPLOYABILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMPLOYABILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

MARY MARGARET L O'DONNELL RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Employment services, namely employment hiring, recruiting, placement, staffing and career networking services, employment counseling, all for the disabled populationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 4, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 28, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 7, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 8, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance