Drawing for ACCELIO

USPTO serial 76311222

ACCELIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ACCELIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn S. Cassan

LYNN S CASSAN CASSAN MACLEANSTE 401 80 ABERDEEN STOTTAWA, ON K1S 5R5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software applications for businesses in the area of workflow, operations and products integration and for the development and integration of computerized forms and computer software for the creation of business applicationsACTIVE—
042APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE COMPUTERIZED TRACKING AND REPORTING OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTEGRATING CUSTOMIZED SOFTWARE AND COMPUTERIZED FORMS INTO EXISTING COMPUTERIZED SYSTEMS; CUSTOM DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS FORMS, NAMELY, THE DEVELOPMENT OF CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC BUSINESS FORMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTALLATION FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE DATABASE FEATURING NEWS, WEATHER, SPORTS A, AND CURRENT EVENTS OF INTEREST TO SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance