USPTO serial 76311561
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Douglas, Isle of Man, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyann L. Kostello
DYANN L KOSTELLO MICHAEL BEST AND FRIEDRIC100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice Creams | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |