USPTO serial 76311622
CASINO MERCHANDISING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2888168Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASINO MERCHANDISING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirstin M. Jahn
Pam Bowsher Alliance Gaming6601 South Bermuda RoadLas Vegas, NV 89119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Networked gaming system, comprised of computer hardware and software for accounting, player tracking, progressives, inventory, administration, prize pay outs and calculations, security controls, configuration management, prize redemption and cashier support | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Design Group
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Design Group
- Other trademarks owned by Sierra Design Group
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CASINO MERCHANDISING TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |