USPTO serial 76311678
UAW CHAPLAINCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UAW CHAPLAINCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Detroit, MI
Detroit, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gail Tuler Friedman
GAIL TULER FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN & FRIEDMAN LTD566 W ADAMS ST STE 250CHICAGO, IL 60661UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COUNSELING IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH, MARRIAGE, DRUG REHABILITATION, AND CAREER AND NON-DENOMINATIONAL MISTERIAL SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Inplement Workers of America (UAW)
- Other trademarks owned by International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Inplement Workers of America (UAW)
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UAW CHAPLAINCY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |