USPTO serial 76311706
THE ORIGINAL STEEL CITY CHILI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2816081Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL STEEL CITY CHILI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Renfrew, PA
Renfrew, PA
Renfrew, PA
Renfrew, PA
Renfrew, PA
Darby, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared Chili | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Samuel
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Samuel
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Sandra
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Sandra
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Sandra
- Other trademarks owned by Calabrese, Samuel
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named THE ORIGINAL STEEL CITY CHILI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 10, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |