USPTO serial 76311930
4910
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 4910?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN FOX, ROTHSCHILD, O'BRIEN & FRANKEL2000 MARKET ST FL 10PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flame retardant fluoropolymer plastic material for the semiconductor industry sold in sheets, rods, and other preformed shapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |