USPTO serial 76312356
POWERTOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERTOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas J. McEvoy
DOUGLAS J MCEVOY GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSON280 N OLD WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-5394UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Merchandising point of purchase displays constructed of metal, namely both stand-alone displays and those for use with existing gondola displays for merchandising products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |