USPTO serial 76312392
NUTRIGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, REGINA C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Hemphill
LISA HEMPHILL GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in nutrition and educational assessments for children and youth, materials included therewith, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, The
- Other trademarks owned by Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named NUTRIGRAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |