Drawing for INGENIUM DEDUCTIVE PROTEOMICS

USPTO serial 76312427

INGENIUM DEDUCTIVE PROTEOMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INGENIUM DEDUCTIVE PROTEOMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Talivaldis Cepuritis

TALIVALDIS CEPURITIS OLSON & HIERL, LTD20 N WACKER DR FL 36CHICAGO, IL 60606-2806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001CHEMICALS, NAMELY DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC AND/OR RESEARCH USEACTIVE—
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, THERAPEUTICS, NAMELY, DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR CLINICAL OR MEDICAL LABORATORY USE; CLINICAL MEDICAL REAGENTS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, PAIN, NEUROLOGICAL, IMMUNOLOGICAL, CARDIAC AND METABOLIC DISEASEACTIVE—
042CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance