USPTO serial 76312558
NEURAL VISION CORRECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEURAL VISION CORRECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Burse
DAVID T BURSE BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and associated computer hardware for delivering visual perception tasks, as well as for delivering other perception stimuli for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, for improving visual perception and acuity, and for developing improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system, all for use by vision care professionals, therapists, and individuals; computer hardware, computer peripherals and associated computer hardware, namely, computer audio systems and headphones, automated glasses, input devices, sensors for measuring distance between subject and monitor, sensors for measuring room ambient light, sensors for measuring computer monitor luminescence, hardware and eyewear to enable three dimensional image generation and perception, and moldings, all for use by vision care professionals, therapists, and individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing training to vision care professionals and individuals on use of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system of individuals; providing training on computer software to vision care professionals and individuals; providing interactive training in the form of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system of individuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Administering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli, for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, and for improving visual perception and acuity in individuals; technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer software problems in person, via telephone, and via e-mail | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |