Drawing for THE GREAT SAN FRANCISCO SMOKEHOUSE

USPTO serial 76312736

THE GREAT SAN FRANCISCO SMOKEHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GREAT SAN FRANCISCO SMOKEHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NOEL M COOK

NOEL M COOK OWEN WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MAIL ORDER CATALOG, RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIPS ALL FEATURING SMOKED FOODS AND GIFT PACKAGES, NAMELY, SEAFOOD, FISH, MEATS, POULTRY AND CHEESEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance