USPTO serial 76312776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Montreal, Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1800UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Networking, telecommunications, connectivity, routing, fiber optic transport and network access equipment, namely, traffic managers, servers, routers, hubs, switches, optical amplifiers and switches, wireless switches, base stations, gateways, bridges, brouters, concentrators, aggregators, modems, network interface cards, line cards, compensation modules, switch routers, electronic equipment racks, shelves and modules, backplanes, mid-planes and automatic call distributors; and computer programs relating to the foregoing, namely, computer programs for networking computers, for network traffic engineering, and for accessing, controlling, monitoring and managing global computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks, metropolitan area networks and storage area networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |