USPTO serial 76312987
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail gift shop services; hotel business center services, namely photocopying, mail handling, and telephone answering; and providing conference room facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | casino services; riverboat casino services; gambling services; amusement arcade services; and entertainment services, namely providing and presenting live stage show, band, vocal, instrumental, music, dance and comic performances, providing movie theater services for guests, providing in-room movies for guests, providing big screen television sports and entertainment viewing for guests, and providing facilities for listening to music for guests; providing tennis and golf facilities; providing swimming pool facilities; and providing fitness center facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | resort hotel services; hotel services; lodging services; hotel concierge services; restaurant services; snack bar services; bar services; night club services; providing sauna and hot tub facilities; providing health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; providing child care services; and providing styling salon services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |