Drawing for READYCLICK & CONFERENCE

USPTO serial 76313119

READYCLICK & CONFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READYCLICK & CONFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN L. DILLON

WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLPSTE 28001100 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software providing an interface or gateway to networks that allows multiple-user access to a global information and communication network connected by common protocols for the exchange, transfer and dissemination of voice, data, facsimile, e-mail, voice mail, cross media messaging, video, audio, documents, files and information; and computer software enabling users to initiate and to access control of the features and functionality of conferencing services through the global computer information networkACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services; namely, conferencing services that enable multiple-user communication in real time with ability to exchange voice, data, facsimile, cross media messaging, video and audio and information via computer, facsimile, global communications network, global computer information network and internal computer network platforms and with the ability to initiate such services via telephone, computer or global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance