Drawing for Serial No. 76313238

USPTO serial 76313238

Serial No. 76313238

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOWARD, CHERYL L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76313238?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shannon T. Vale

SHANNON T VALE FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the management and development of business in the banking, insurance, utilities, telecommunications, government, media, technology, retail, consumer goods, travel, leisure, aerospace and defense, manufacturing, engineering, construction, chemical and pharmaceutical industriesACTIVE—
035Business management, business project management, outsourcing in the field of business management, outsourcing in the field of information technology; business consulting, market research services, personnel management services, business consultation by means of the global computer network; business consultation in the field of business project management and business process management; personnel recruitment consultancy and personnel recruitment services; preparation of business reports relating to the aforesaidACTIVE—
041Educational and training services namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of business change management, mentoring, coaching, skills transfer, facilitation, competency assessments, project reviews and methodology implementation servicesACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the fields of designing, planning and managing integrated software programs; information technology consulting and advisory services relating to developing and integrating computer programs for businesses, computer system analysis, computer programming services namely developing and integrating computer programs for businesses; computer advisory and consulting services relating theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 28, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 14, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 27, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance