Drawing for SENSA TOUCH

USPTO serial 76313346

SENSA TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSA TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA.WINGER; CHRISTOPHER B. SCHNEIDER

LISA WINGER CHRISTOPHER B SCHNEIDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID2707 BUTTERFIELD RDOAK BROOK, IL 60523UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Handle grips for writing instruments, namely, pens, pencils, fountain pens, roller pens, and mechanical pensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance