Drawing for ACQUISITION SOLUTIONS VIRTUAL KNOWLEDGE CENTER

USPTO serial 76313399

ACQUISITION SOLUTIONS VIRTUAL KNOWLEDGE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACQUISITION SOLUTIONS VIRTUAL KNOWLEDGE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph M. Tener

RALPH M TENER MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC11350 RANDOM HILLS RD STE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7421UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Research services and policy evaluation and development, all in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practices; assessment of organizations and procurements and facilitation of groups to identify and publicize opportunities for reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvements in contracts and contracting processes and to recommend methods for implementing such reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvementsACTIVE—
041Training services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, conferences, workshops, materials, tools, and multi-media presentations, in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practicesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely providing on-line publications and information, application service provider featuring software, knowledge management services, and preparation of guides, handbooks, white papers, briefing papers, research reports, issue analyses, training materials, requirements analyses, alternatives analyses, cost-benefit analyses, requests for proposals, and proposals, all in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 21, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 8, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 27, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance