USPTO serial 76313478
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ARLINGTON, VA
Oakton, VA
Oakton, VA
Oakton, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph M. Tener
RALPH M TENER MCCANDLISH & LILLARD, PC11350 RANDOM HILLS RD STE 500FAIRFAX, VA 22030-7421UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Management consulting and consultation services to businesses and government agencies, research services, and policy evaluation and development, all in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practices; assessment of organizations and procurements and facilitation of groups to identify and publicize opportunities for reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvements in contracts and contracting processes and to recommend methods for implementing such reforms, innovations, initiatives, and improvements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 1997 |
| 041 | Training services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, conferences, workshops, materials, tools, and multi-media presentations, in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 1997 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing online publications and information, application service provider featuring software, knowledge management services, and preparation of guides, handbooks, white papers, briefing papers, research reports, issue analyses, training materials, requirements analyses, alternatives analyses, cost-benefit analyses, requests for proposals, and proposals, all in the fields of government contracting, market research, strategic sourcing and source selection, mission and strategic planning, requirements definition, asset management, supply chain management, program management, contract performance management, acquisition knowledge management, procurement, and related laws, regulations, policies, and practices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 7, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |