USPTO serial 76313574
CARMENGIRLS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARMENGIRLS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Forest, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Anne Been
CAROL ANNE BEEN SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALP O BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, moisturizers, toners, skin cleansing preparations, skin cremes, skin lotions, skin emollients, lotions, masques and astringents for cosmetic purposes; Soaps for hands, face and body; Cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip gloss, eyeshadow, foundation creme, blushes, face powder, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; Personal hygiene products, namely, total body cleansing preparations, toilet water, perfumes and colognes, massage oils and lotions; Moisturizing body oils and lotions; Nail polish; Bath products, namely, oils, gels, powders and salts; Hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, moisturizers, finishing rinse, lotions, waving lotions, straightening lotions, styling lotions, cremes, waving cremes, straightening cremes, styling cremes, mousses, gels, spray and sculpting gels, hairsprays, coloring preparations, hair dyes, and finishing products, namely, waxes, stylers, pomades, emollients, and finishers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |