USPTO serial 76313597
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Strongsville, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL W. GARVEY
MICHAEL W GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLPSTE 12001801 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely floral wire and wedding CD case made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, cake knives | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, fused pearls sold in bulk sprays, strings of beads, pearl loops and sprays, and ornamental lapel pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, project books for wedding gifts and favors, wedding memory albums, wedding photograph albums, aisle runners, guest register books, pens, plume pen sets, nested boxes made of paper mache, stationery boxes, and floral tape for wrapping live and artifical flowers | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, floral twist ties made of wire wrapped in paper and foam supports for floral arrangements | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, umbrellas, parasols and satin purses | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, pillows, floral vases, supports for floral arrangements and holders for floral arrangements, folding fans, picture frames, pew clips made of plastic, wristlet kaber clips made of elastic, point of purchase displays and display racks, non metal jewelry boxes and plastic cake decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, drinking glasses, non-metal decorative boxes, cake servers, hair combs, lapel pins, candlesticks, serving forks, serving spoons, non-metal baskets, and candle rings not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, tulle on bolts and handkerchiefs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, wristlets, garters, satin collars, headbands, headbands with combs, bridal veils, headpiece combs, headpieces, communion veils | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, collars for floral arrangements made of plastic with silk flowers and plastic with fabric, wired ribbon, bows for wrapping, tulle circles, artificial flowers, artificial foliage, ribbon roses and ribbon rose bud flowers, pearl and satin leaves, decorative hair combs, artificial flower arrangements, artificial flower wreaths, hair ribbons, ornamental bows of textile for decoration, hair ornaments, barrettes, hat ornaments and hat pins of non-precious metal, and straight pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Bridal goods and accessories, namely, party favor ornaments in the nature of small doves, rings, flowers, birds, swans, cherubs, hearts on stems, jewel boxes, bells, miniature glasses, bottles, shoes, top hats, canes, and baskets; bridal bubbles; craft kits for making bridal accessories | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring bridal goods and accessories; catalog services featuring bridal goods and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |