USPTO serial 76313627
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEI-LAN STARK
MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY CO500 S BUENA VIS STBURBANK, CA 91521-0633UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books for babies, infants and toddlers; flashcards | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |