Drawing for CRF INTERNATIONAL

USPTO serial 76313695

CRF INTERNATIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRF INTERNATIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Block

RICHARD J BLOCK MIRSKY & BLOCK PLLC303 S BROADWAY STE 222TARRYTOWN, NY 10591-5410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030frozen Mexican foods; namely, burritos, taquitos, chimichangas and enchiladasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 29, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2004PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Feb 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 2, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance