USPTO serial 76313831
PHAT FARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHAT FARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Hair accessories, namely, bobby pins, curling pins, waving pins for the hair, hair ties, hair ornaments, hair pins, barrettes, elastic hair bands, hair ribbons, hair bows, ponytail holders, hair bows with clips, hair bands, hair clips, hair buckles, hair roller clips and pins, hair nets, hair wraps, clam clips for hair, claw clips, twisters, hair scrunchies, snap clips, hair curl clips, sleep clips, salon clips, hair frosting caps, non-electric hair curlers and rollers, braids, braiding pins, and ornamental combs worn on hair; ornamental novelty buttons and pins; clothing and shirt buttons; zipper pulls and zippers; snap fasteners; clothing buckles; clasps for clothing; belt clasps; belt buckles not of precious metal; cloth patches for clothing; ornamental cloth patches; embroidered patches for clothing; patches for repairing textile articles; hat pins; safety pins; embroidered emblems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |