Drawing for WAREHOUSEBANK.COM

USPTO serial 76313855

WAREHOUSEBANK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAREHOUSEBANK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHERRY H. FLAX

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Commercial Lending Services, namely, providing loans and lines of credit to mortgage banks and brokersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 29, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 11, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 28, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance